INDEPENDENT MERCHANT INTELLIGENCEPUBLIC BETA / SEPTEMBER 2026 BASELINE
Sample report / Fictional Merchant 012

A problem.
A repair.
Evidence of change.

See the workflow before you scan. Every merchant, result, percentage and timeline entry on this page is illustrative.

01Scan02Explain03Prove04Fix05Recheck06Feedback
What blocks the journey? / Illustrative

Start with product truth.

These three gaps are prioritized because they affect the information a shopping agent can retrieve. The example makes no claim about actual checkout success.

01
Demo gap · Not detected in sample

An offer has no readable price

A shopping agent cannot retrieve a single price from this example product’s Offer.

Evidence, repair and verification

Evidence

Offer.price omitted

Source: fictional product fixture · Day 1

What and where to change

Map the existing approved catalog price into the public Offer. Match the same product and currency. Do not invent a price.

Location: Product-page Offer generator. Exact file depends on the real stack.

Verify: inspect the same product and mode, then recheck. Any change to product facts, policies or customer-visible text requires merchant approval.

02
Demo gap · Not detected in sample

Stock state is missing from the offer

The example page does not provide a machine-readable availability declaration.

Evidence, repair and verification

Evidence

Offer.availability omitted

Source: fictional product fixture · Day 1

What and where to change

Expose the merchant’s actual stock state with the supported vocabulary. A readable declaration does not prove warehouse accuracy.

Location: Inventory-to-storefront mapping. Exact file depends on the real stack.

Verify: inspect the same product and mode, then recheck. Any change to product facts, policies or customer-visible text requires merchant approval.

03
Demo gap · Not detected in sample

The product cannot explain its distinguishing details

The supplied example lacks the description needed to compare this item.

Evidence, repair and verification

Evidence

Product.description omitted

Source: fictional product fixture · Day 1

What and where to change

Reuse approved product facts. Stop for merchant input if the description or facts are missing.

Location: Product content template. Exact file depends on the real stack.

Verify: inspect the same product and mode, then recheck. Any change to product facts, policies or customer-visible text requires merchant approval.

Live Proof format / Illustrative values

A rate needs a denominator.

These numbers demonstrate the presentation. No live merchant was requested for this report.

Product discovery

Find → retrieve → identify one product

3 / 3 successful

100% in these illustrative attempts

Price + variant retrieval

Failure step: resolve a single offer

2 / 3 successful

67% in these illustrative attempts

Inventory declaration

Failure step: retrieve declared stock state

2 / 3 successful

67% in these illustrative attempts

Cart reachability

No cart interaction, order or payment

Manual verification required

Excluded from the denominator

Policy retrieval

Find → retrieve one policy page

3 / 3 successful

100% in these illustrative attempts

Even a real 3/3 would describe three bounded retrieval attempts, not all agents, independent price accuracy or future sales.

Before / After / Fictional

3 improved. 1 unchanged.
0 regressions.

Same product identity. Same check method. Fresh evidence after the illustrated repair.

Measured signalBeforeAfterResult
priceOffer.price omittedOffer.price mapped to the approved catalog valueImproved in example
availabilityOffer.availability omittedAvailability declaration now exposedImproved in example
descriptionProduct.description omittedExisting merchant-approved description mappedImproved in example
Cart executionNot testedNot testedUnchanged safety boundary

The real product calls an improvement only when a fresh, comparable deterministic finding moves from Needs attention to Verified. A checkbox or edited explanation does not verify a repair.

Monitoring history / Fictional

Tell me when
something changes.

Meaningful alerts preserve the before and after. No-change runs do not create daily email noise.

Day 1

Baseline captured

Three example fields need attention.

Day 2

Recheck: three improvements

Approved catalog values are now exposed.

Day 5

Availability declaration disappears

Regression detected; cause unknown.

Day 5

An alert is shown in this example

What changed, why it matters, evidence and recheck action. No actual email was sent.

Day 6

The signal recovers

An observed recovery would be recorded separately.

Help after the audit

Turn the next fix into a clear brief.

Implementation reports and human review are being scoped. These buttons record interest only. No payment, booking or delivery commitment is created.

Implementation report

A proposed developer brief with prioritized repairs, evidence and a post-fix recheck plan.

Human review

A proposed review of uncertain findings, possible false positives and the implementation order.

Ongoing monitoring

Watch meaningful changes to public evidence, with clear scope and a way to stop notifications.

Explore monitoring →

Evidence stays attached. Real reports include sources, dates, scope, limitations and safe next steps. This fictional example is excluded from product-outcome measurements and research.

Inspect the method →